edger
Nov 4 2005, 12:23 PM
Is there a big difference from the 1999 xc 600 to the 2000 xc 600 if so what are the changes?
SortaStock
Nov 4 2005, 01:18 PM
I think they got new graphics for 2000 and they might also get the white face guages in 2000 where the 1999's were black. I think that's 'bout it;)
duff
Nov 4 2005, 05:59 PM
Yes, in 2000 the 600 XC SP had the "small block" 600 that was based on the 440 engine, which also had Variable exhaust. The 99 600 was a big block 600, and so was the 2000 600 deluxe.
xcr440
Nov 6 2005, 08:37 AM
Engine is the main difference. Other than that all cosmetic. Bro in-law has one. Any more questions, ask away.
Triple650Indy
Nov 13 2005, 12:26 AM
QUOTE(duff @ Nov 4 2005, 05:59 PM)

Yes, in 2000 the 600 XC SP had the "small block" 600 that was based on the 440 engine, which also had Variable exhaust. The 99 600 was a big block 600, and so was the 2000 600 deluxe.
Bingo. 99' was the first year for that small block Right?
xcr440
Nov 15 2005, 05:10 PM
00 was the first year production for the 600. Was only available in the sp. Which was based off the 440 xcr mill.
rowley01
Nov 17 2005, 01:02 PM
99 was a good year for polaris, As far as proformance!, The xcr 800 and xc 700 riped
terez
Nov 18 2005, 09:23 AM
Big differences between the 99 and 200 XC6!!
2000 had the 1st ves small block 600 motor where the 99 had the non ves big block 600.
The ves 600 is faster/better on fuel/quieter than the old big block 600.
The old 600 was a good motor, very reliable.... hard on fuel/loud...snappy though.
The ves 600 smoked everything in 2000/2001 and was cleaning up the grass drags even in 700 and 800 stock. It is also very fast on top as the gen2 chassis rolls very well and is aerodynamic.
The 2000 gen2 also had nicer ergos and a nicer seat as well as a much better rear suspension.
The 2000 XC6 was a very big improvement over 99.
rowley01
Nov 21 2005, 12:19 PM
^ Sorry, I was prolly thinking it was 00 then..Not 99, I get them mixed up!
^ Sorry, I was prolly thinking it was 00 then..Not 99, I get them mixed up!
Serpent
Nov 27 2005, 08:42 PM
QUOTE(rowley01 @ Nov 17 2005, 01:02 PM)

99 was a good year for polaris, As far as proformance!, The xcr 800 and xc 700 riped
My '99 700 XC SP was a dog. My brother's '98 700 XC smoked it every time.
edger
Dec 4 2005, 11:22 AM
Anyone know how much horse power the 2000 xc 600 sp has?
Serpent
Dec 4 2005, 03:44 PM
About 115-118 hp.
edger
Dec 9 2005, 07:33 AM
Will a 00 600 XC sp beat an 03 F5?
indy440
Dec 9 2005, 09:30 PM
^probably the 500 might get you outta the hole, but other than that the 600 will have it.
xcf44022
Feb 14 2006, 01:06 AM
i had a 2000 xcsp 600 it was quick but the f5s were quicker my xcf would beat it up to 80 though i miss em both alot snappier and trail faster feeling than the 800 i got now starting to ramble on and on and on now
crdude
Feb 14 2006, 05:45 PM
i beleave the 00's also had AL radius rods and what not that made them lighter. might of just been the rmk 7's.
QUOTE(Serpent @ Nov 27 2005, 05:42 PM)

My '99 700 XC SP was a dog. My brother's '98 700 XC smoked it every time.
somthing must have been wrong with your 99, i'v ridden a 99 rmk700 and my 98 xc700 back to back and the rmk is no dog.
free2reem
May 20 2006, 02:42 PM
from what i know the 98 xc early build was faster...the later build+99 had somthing differnt in the crank i think... the 99 was havier and slower from the difference in the motors... i dont know exatly why but all i know is if you line up a good 98 with a good 99 the 98 will most likey win...
DeerHunter88
Sep 16 2006, 05:17 PM
Im looking a t a 1999 xc 600 and a 2001 xc 600 and i was wondering which is a faster sled
BuddyP
Sep 18 2006, 08:48 PM
QUOTE(DeerHunter88 @ Sep 16 2006, 07:17 PM)

Im looking a t a 1999 xc 600 and a 2001 xc 600 and i was wondering which is a faster sled
The '01 will be quicker, you'll like the Edge chassis a whole lot better too.
crdude
Sep 26 2006, 11:14 PM
QUOTE(crdude @ Feb 14 2006, 03:45 PM)

i beleave the 00's also had AL radius rods and what not that made them lighter. might of just been the rmk 7's.
somthing must have been wrong with your 99, i'v ridden a 99 rmk700 and my 98 xc700 back to back and the rmk is no dog.
the jugs were different, the 98 had 220 and 99+ had 847 or somthing like that.
you wouldnt be able to tell the difference, im guessing 3hp between the two?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.