I dislike the rmk 900s. Mountain sleds are getting out of hand. Who needs a 162 or 166. I think we should all have rmk 700s with 136's. Just my opinion. I know everyone will prolly think im nuts for posting this but its true.

There is always someone who wants bigger and better. Myself I'm happy with a shorttrack. But i dont do a whole lot of mountain climbing either, actually none, not what i would call a mountain anyway.

haha nice james.. so when you getting a sled??!!??!!1??one!

If your going to have a long track, why not just go bug? I've got the 2006 900 RMK with a 151' and 2.4" lugs. You can really tell the difference in pull up the steep and deep. It's like a truck.

trucks get stuck in snow ez

136 tracks around here are stuck all day long.

I wouldn't ride in the deep/steep stuff with anything less than a 144 2". just my .02

The bigger the better when it comes to deep pow ridin. I ride revelstoke b.c. alot and you need as much traction as you can get. 30-50ft of snow a year spells big track

yall are crazy, 144 or less, no need for the football field tracks

funny, i ride my 700 circles around people on rmk7's with 156"s and virtical edges with 144"s up in the mountins here in ak... its all in the rider...